lamdis

How to appeal an experimental or investigational denial

Reviewed · 9 sources

The short answer

Plans deny care as experimental or investigational when they decide the evidence for it is not strong enough for your condition. You can ask for the plan's definition and its clinical reasoning, answer them with FDA status, compendia, guidelines and published studies, and, in most private plans, have an independent reviewer decide.

How plans use the label

Federal claims rules treat a decision that care is experimental or investigational as a denial you can appeal. Each plan writes its own definition of the term, usually in the definitions or exclusions section of the plan document. Your appeal has to answer that exact wording, so find it first.

The label can be applied to a new device or procedure, a test with little published evidence, or a drug prescribed for a use the FDA has not approved. Doctors may prescribe an approved drug for an unapproved use when they judge it medically appropriate.

Get the plan's definition and its reasoning

Ask the plan in writing for:

These rules cover employer plans and, through 45 CFR 147.136, most individual plans. On appeal, an employer plan must consult a health care professional with training and experience in the field of medicine involved. For deadlines, see the pages for employer plans, Marketplace plans, Medicare Advantage, Original Medicare and Medicaid.

Evidence that answers the denial

The central question in these appeals is whether the evidence supports the treatment for someone in your situation. Ask your doctor's office to gather:

  • FDA status. Whether the drug or device is FDA-approved, and for which use. For an off-label use, FDA has not determined that the drug is safe and effective for the unapproved use, so the appeal needs other evidence for that use.
  • Drug compendia. Listings in standard reference compendia such as the American Hospital Formulary Service drug information, which the insurance commissioners' model law counts as medical or scientific evidence.
  • Clinical practice guidelines from medical specialty societies that recommend the treatment for your condition.
  • Peer-reviewed studies, ideally controlled trials, in patients like you.
  • Your history. Standard treatments already tried, with dates and results, and why they failed or cannot be used.

A letter from your doctor should tie this evidence to your case and to the plan's definition, point by point.

Independent review covers these denials

In most private plans, an experimental or investigational denial can go to an independent reviewer. The federal external review process covers a plan's determination that a treatment is experimental or investigational, and HealthCare.gov lists these denials among those eligible.

State review programs must handle these cases in a way substantially similar to section 10 of a model law written by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Under that model, the treating physician certifies that standard treatments have not worked, that standard treatments are not medically appropriate for the patient, or that no covered standard treatment is more beneficial. The reviewer then considers whether the treatment has been approved by the FDA for the condition, or whether medical or scientific evidence shows it is more likely than not to be more beneficial than standard treatments.

The model allows a faster review if your doctor certifies in writing that the treatment would be significantly less effective if not promptly initiated. It also applies only when the service is not explicitly listed as an excluded benefit. Your state's version may differ, so follow the instructions in your final denial letter.

If you are in a clinical trial

Federal law, 42 U.S.C. 300gg-8, says a group health plan or insurer covering a qualified person may not deny or limit coverage of routine patient costs connected with an approved clinical trial. Routine costs are items and services the plan would typically cover for someone not enrolled in a trial.

They do not include the investigational item, device or service itself, or items provided only to collect data for the study. The rule covers phase I through IV trials for cancer or another life-threatening disease or condition that meet federal criteria, and a plan may require you to use an in-network provider if one is taking part in the trial.

Medicare covers some costs for certain clinical research studies. Medicaid programs must cover routine patient costs for beneficiaries participating in a qualifying clinical trial on or after January 1, 2022. If a plan denies routine care because you joined a trial, say so in the appeal and cite the rule that fits your coverage.

Questions people ask

Is off-label use the same as experimental?

Not automatically. Doctors may prescribe approved drugs for unapproved uses, and whether a plan covers that depends on its definition and the evidence. Compendia listings and specialty guidelines can help show the use is accepted.

Can I get a faster external review?

You can ask. HealthCare.gov says in urgent situations you can request external review before the internal appeal is finished, and the model state law allows expedited review when a delay would make the treatment significantly less effective.

Will my insurance pay for care during a clinical trial?

For approved trials, group plans and insurers may not deny routine patient costs, meaning care they would cover anyway. The investigational item itself is not included.

What if the plan says the treatment is excluded outright?

An explicit exclusion is harder to appeal. Under the model law, experimental-treatment review applies when the service is not explicitly listed as an excluded benefit. See exclusion denials for other routes.

Sources

  1. eCFR: 29 CFR 2560.503-1 Claims procedurea failure to cover an item or service for which benefits are otherwise provided because it is determined to be experimental or investigational or not medically necessary or appropriate
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Understanding Unapproved Use of Approved Drugs "Off Label"healthcare providers generally may prescribe the drug for an unapproved use when they judge that it is medically appropriate for their patient
  3. eCFR: 45 CFR 147.136 Internal claims and appeals and external review processesA health insurance issuer offering individual health insurance coverage must comply with all the requirements of the ERISA internal claims and appeals procedures applicable to group health plans under 29 CFR 2560.503-1
  4. National Association of Insurance Commissioners: Uniform Health Carrier External Review Model Act (Model #76)The following standard reference compendia
  5. HealthCare.gov: External ReviewAny denial that involves a determination that a treatment is experimental or investigational
  6. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School: 42 U.S. Code § 300gg-8 - Coverage for individuals participating in approved clinical trialsmay not deny (or limit or impose additional conditions on) the coverage of routine patient costs for items and services furnished in connection with participation in the trial
  7. Medicare.gov: Clinical Research Study CoverageMedicare covers some costs for certain clinical research studies
  8. CMS Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services (Apr. 13, 2022): SMD # 21-005: UPDATED: Mandatory Medicaid Coverage of Routine Patient Costs Furnished in Connection with Participation in Qualifying Clinical Trialswho are participating in a qualifying clinical trial on or after January 1, 2022
  9. HealthCare.gov: External review - GlossaryIn urgent situations, an external review may be requested even if the internal appeals process isn't yet completed.

This page is general information about appeal rules in the United States. It is not legal or medical advice. Rules can change, and your plan’s documents and your denial letter control the dates that apply to you.